内容来源：https://www.theverge.com/policy/823650/ai-moratorium-house-gop-scalise

内容总结：

美国国会共和党人士正试图通过年度国防授权法案，重启对人工智能领域的联邦立法优先权。众议院多数党领袖史蒂夫·斯卡利斯透露，考虑在必须通过的《国防授权法案》中加入条款，以取代各州自行制定的AI监管法规。前总统特朗普亦在社交媒体发声，强调建立"单一联邦标准"的必要性，并警告称若维持各州各自为政的监管体系，将导致美国在人工智能竞争中落后于中国。

此举实为年末立法攻坚的常见策略。不过相关提案前景尚不明朗——今年夏季曾有类似动议提议五年暂停各州AI立法，但遭参议院99%议员反对。两党议员此前均对暂停令期限过长、条款范围过宽表示担忧，且红蓝两州现已出台的AI相关法律可能因此失效。

支持方则认为，零散的州级监管将阻碍人工智能这一新兴行业发展，削弱美国对中国的竞争优势。据政治新闻网报道，法案具体条款预计将在感恩节前明确，全体表决将于12月进行。

中文翻译：

国会共和党人正试图重启一项旨在推翻各州人工智能法规的法案，此前相关提案于今年初被迫搁置。共和党人寻求通过年度国防授权法案（NDAA）实现这一目标——众议院多数党领袖史蒂夫·斯卡利斯向媒体透露，考虑在NDAA中加入禁止各州监管人工智能的条款。前总统特朗普也在社交平台发声，呼吁国会建立统一联邦标准："我们必须用单一联邦标准取代50个州各自为政的监管体系，否则中国将在AI竞赛中轻松超越我们。"

利用NDAA这类"必须通过"的法案附加修正案是年终立法的常见策略。但新条款的具体内容尚不明朗，因今夏提交表决的"五年暂停期"提案曾遭参议院99%议员反对。早前争议焦点在于：最初提议的十年暂停期过长，且条款措辞可能泛化至波及儿童网络安全法等科技监管体系。若联邦法案通过，红蓝两州已出台的AI相关法律将面临失效。

支持暂停州级监管的阵营（包括NetChoice等科技行业协会）认为，人工智能作为新兴产业若面临各州法规拼凑，将阻碍创新并削弱美国对华竞争力。据政治新闻网报道，NDAA具体条款将于感恩节前公布，预计12月进行全体表决。

英文来源：

House Republicans are looking to renew an effort to override state AI laws after a previous version came to a screeching halt earlier this year.
Republicans are looking for a way to bring back the AI moratorium
A year-end defense bill might include another shot at overriding state AI laws.
A year-end defense bill might include another shot at overriding state AI laws.
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA) told Punchbowl News he’s considering adding language to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) effectively banning state AI regulations. Later on Tuesday, President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social urging Congress to standardize AI regulations. “We MUST have one Federal Standard instead of a patchwork of 50 State Regulatory Regimes,” he wrote. “If we don’t, then China will easily catch us in the AI race. Put it in the NDAA, or pass a separate Bill, and nobody will ever be able to compete with America.”
Tacking amendments onto the NDAA, which lawmakers consider a must-pass bill, is a common strategy to get legislation across the finish line at the end of the year. It’s not totally clear what the new language would look like considering 99 out of 100 senators ultimately turned against the version of a five-year moratorium on state AI laws that was put to a vote this summer.
When the issue came up earlier this year, many lawmakers expressed concern about the initial 10-year term proposed for the moratorium, and the potential that language could be so broad as to cover a host of other tech regulations, including kids’ online safety laws. Both red and blue states have adopted AI-related laws that could be effectively nullified if Congress were to vote to preempt or pause them.
Proponents of the moratorium, including tech industry associations like NetChoice, argued that a complicated patchwork of state regulations for an early-stage industry like AI could hamper innovation and threaten US competitiveness with China.
More details on the NDAA’s language are expected before the Thanksgiving holiday, with a vote on track for December, according to Politico.