内容来源：https://techcrunch.com/2025/12/14/grok-gets-the-facts-wrong-about-bondi-beach-shooting/

内容总结：

马斯克旗下人工智能公司xAI开发的聊天机器人Grok，在其社交平台X上传播关于澳大利亚邦迪海滩大规模枪击事件的不实信息，引发广泛关注。

该机器人在多篇帖文中错误指认见义勇为者身份，将实际制服枪手的43岁男子艾哈迈德·阿拉哈迈德误称为"爱德华·克雷布特里"，甚至将其照片与以色列人质混淆。部分帖文还质疑现场视频真实性，并牵强关联巴以冲突等无关内容。

尽管Grok已对部分明显错误进行修正，例如将枪击视频误判为"阿尔弗雷德气旋"的帖文，但其关于关键人物身份的更正说明仍存在漏洞——将错误归因于"新闻报道失误或虚构角色玩笑"，而所引用信源疑似来自人工智能生成的失效新闻网站。

此次事件再次引发公众对人工智能在突发新闻中传播风险的警惕。

中文翻译：

由埃隆·马斯克旗下xAI公司开发、在其社交媒体平台X上走红的聊天机器人Grok，近日在澳大利亚邦迪海滩大规模枪击事件中多次传播不实信息。

科技媒体Gizmodo指出，Grok在多篇帖文中错误指认了现场解除枪手武装的43岁旁观者艾哈迈德·阿尔·艾哈迈德的身份，并质疑记录其行为的视频与照片真实性。

其中一篇帖文将照片中的男子误认为以色列人质，另一篇则牵强附会地提及以色列军队对待巴勒斯坦人的情况。还有帖文声称，真正解除枪手武装的是一位名叫爱德华·克拉布特里的"43岁IT专业人士兼高级解决方案架构师"。

目前Grok似乎正在修正部分错误。至少有一篇声称枪击视频实为"阿尔弗雷德气旋"的帖文，在重新评估后已被更正。

该聊天机器人随后承认了艾哈迈德的身份，并解释称："误解源于网络疯传的帖文错误地将其指认为爱德华·克拉布特里，这可能是由于报道失误或引用虚构角色的玩笑所致。"（相关文章出自一个基本无法正常访问、疑似由人工智能生成的新闻网站。）

英文来源：

Grok, the chatbot built by Elon Musk’s xAI and popularized on his social media platform X, appears to have repeatedly spread misinformation about today’s mass shooting at Bondi Beach in Australia.
Gizmodo pointed to a number of posts where Grok misidentified the bystander — 43-year-old Ahmed al Ahmed — who disarmed one of the gunmen, and where it questioned the authenticity of videos and photos capturing al Ahmed’s actions.
In one post, the chatbot misidentified the man in a photo as an Israeli hostage, and in another post brought up irrelevant information about the Israeli army’s treatment of Palestinians. In another post, it claimed a “43-year-old IT professional and senior solutions architect” named Edward Crabtree was the one who actually disarmed a gunman.
Grok does appear to be fixing some of its mistakes. At least one post that reportedly claimed a video of the shooting actually showed Cyclone Alfred has been corrected “upon reevaluation.”
And the chatbot subsequently acknowledged al Ahmed’s identity, writing that the “misunderstanding arises from viral posts that mistakenly identified him as Edward Crabtree, possibly due to a reporting error or a joke referencing a fictional character.” (The article in question appeared on a largely non-functional news site that may be AI-generated.)